While low-code and no-code platforms offer numerous benefits, they also come with their own set of challenges. Understanding these limitations can help you make informed decisions and prepare for potential obstacles.
Limited Functionality and Customisation
This challenge refers to the inherent constraints on what you can do within the platform. These platforms are designed to be user-friendly, often at the expense of flexibility. There may be certain advanced features or specific functionalities that the platform cannot support, then you may face significant limitations. For example, complex algorithms, intricate user interactions, or highly specialised workflows might not be achievable. Users might not be able to fully tailor the application to meet unique requirements, leading to a solution that is “good enough” but not perfect.
While some platforms allow you to request new features, this can be a slow process, delaying your project. However, when such a feature is added to the platform components, it becomes available for everyone as well, causing you to lose your competitive advantage. Additionally, achieving specific, highly customised functionalities often requires custom coding, which may negate the simplicity that initially attracted you to the platform.
Pre-Built Systems and Component Limitations
The platforms come with a set of pre-built components (like forms, buttons, and templates) that you can use to build your application. This means that not everything you might envision is possible out of the box. If you need a specific type of component or a custom-built feature that isn’t available, you’re limited to what the platform offers. You need to deal with the availability and flexibility of the building blocks provided by the platform. While this setup allows for quick development of standard applications, it can be restrictive for more unique or complex needs.
Impact of Product Updates
Product updates from the platform provider can affect your app’s efficiency. Since low-code and no-code platforms are managed by external vendors, updates to the platform can sometimes disrupt the functionality of your applications. These updates might introduce new features, but they can also cause compatibility issues or bugs that you need to address. Relying on an external vendor for updates and bug fixes means you have less control over the stability and reliability of your application.
Applicability to Simple Solutions
Low-code and no-code platforms are best suited for developing simple solutions. When it comes to complex or enterprise-level applications, these platforms often fall short. Advanced features, intricate workflows, and high levels of customisation are difficult to achieve without significant manual coding. For complex applications, you might find yourself needing to supplement the platform with custom code or even switch to traditional development methods altogether.
Longer Support Ticket Resolution Time
Support for low-code and no-code platforms can be slower compared to custom development. When you encounter issues or need assistance, you have to rely on the platform’s support team. Depending on the provider, resolving support tickets can take longer, potentially slowing down your development process and impacting your project’s timeline.
Integration with Legacy Systems
Integrating low-code and no-code applications with existing legacy systems can be challenging. These platforms are not always designed to seamlessly connect with older systems, which might require specific protocols or custom integration work. In some cases, additional mediating integrations are needed, which can increase complexity and costs (also for maintenance). If your organisation relies heavily on legacy systems, ensuring compatibility and smooth integration with new applications built on low-code or no-code platforms can be a significant hurdle.